MANY on other sites I have been on have had nothing but negative to say about those holding a Utah CHL. To make such a 'global' statement, probably is a little harsh, and for that I apologize. Only one person, an LEO, backed up his comments with facts, and not just opinions or crap. This isn't about me. I have my lic. I can go get a Texas lic. if I choose to do so. But when there are so many that want to spew inaccurate info. about others, it's hard to swallow. I would rather those that do not know, or their opinion is so harsh, to just keep their mouth shut and let's help each other. I have my lic. to protect myself and my family. I can only hope that any of us are there when needed to protect those that can't or choose not to.Charles L. Cotton wrote:It's difficult for me to respond nicely to this ridiculous accusation. To globally categorize anyone who has concerns about the Utah CFP in terms of irresponsible advertising and a resulting backlash that harms reciprocity as being "for more govt. control" is to adopt the tactics of Sarah Brady. It smacks of "if you disagree with me, you have evil motives."greggtex wrote:If you're for more govt. control, then I can see you being against the Utah CHL, but if you stand for people protecting themselves, well, that's me.
Chas.
My time online isn't to attach others, but not to listen to inaccurate info. either.