TexasCHLforum.com

rp_photo wrote:

loadedliberal wrote:What do you suggest we do?

A good start would be for Texas to not cave to the TSA/DHS and call their bluff as far as the anti-pat down legislation.

Ditto for the EPA and all the other ways Washington is trying to punish Texas.

rp_photo wrote:Like most other intrusive law enforcement practices, it will incovenience and "false positive" good people while having little effect on wrongdoers.

Wake up, sheeple!

Medic624 wrote:

loadedliberal wrote:I'm ok with this to a point I think behavioral profiling can be a more successful tool for security that some of the things we are trying now. I think Israel has used something to this effect for some time now. I have heard many people on the right call for just this type of technology, or they meant profile muslims and used this a a thin cover for their xenophobia.

Really?!? Wow, the "Right" were calling for a decrease in our personal rights? As far as Xenophobia... well, there are always fringe crazies in every group.

Israel has it down to an efficient science but I'm not sure if it based on a computer based algorithm to determine that someone is a potential mass murderer.

My other issue (is if this is deemed as a viable means to determine who is a threat) this will NOT be simply relegated to the airport. As such they are already making plans to place the full body scanners in Federal courthouses and other sensitive areas the public frequents. Again, under the guise of "We want to ensure that YOU are safe from bad people".