Search found 2 matches

by The Mad Moderate
Fri Jun 10, 2011 7:46 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Oregon LEO's at odds w/medical pot users having CHL's.
Replies: 54
Views: 6487

Re: Oregon LEO's at odds w/medical pot users having CHL's.

Dave2 wrote:
bkj wrote:The thing everyone misses in the Intoxication law is the word IMPAIRED. If you blow a .06 but the officer feels you are impaired, you will be charged. You can be impaired by alcohol, illegal drugs, and prescription drugs and over the counter drugs.
And by lack of sleep. Luckily there's a drug you can take to fix that... :mrgreen:
Theres quite a few but some of them will get you 5-10, and you'll look like :shock: for the next twenty hours or so.
by The Mad Moderate
Thu Jun 09, 2011 5:20 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Oregon LEO's at odds w/medical pot users having CHL's.
Replies: 54
Views: 6487

Re: Oregon LEO's at odds w/medical pot users having CHL's.

Yes there are some (very few) who do get therapeutic relief from marijuana, There are many more who smoke without a "prescription" My question is why does it matter and why is it illegal in the first place. I don't need the government to tell me what to eat, drink, or smoke. They may suggest all they want, present the facts not scare tactics such as "if you buy weed you are supporting terrorists". What happened to "the land of the free"? If I want to eat a deep fried bacon wrapped cheeseburger with a gallon of fries a picture of beer and a joint it should be my prerogative so long as it does not affect anyone else. Having said that carrying a gun while high or drunk for that matter poses risks to other people that I think supersede my right to carry. If a person wants to carry and drink or smoke weed I think they should feel free so long as it does not mix with guns.

Return to “Oregon LEO's at odds w/medical pot users having CHL's.”