Suppresses are more deadly on assault rifles.Jusme wrote:koine2002 wrote:Wow, so a few people used suppressors on their guns to commit a crime. I bet if one were to do a statistical analysis the ratio of suppressors used in crime would be far less than the number of civilian owned suppressors to civilian owned firearms. Nothing to see here.
I'd venture that they just might believe Hollywood when they show a suppressed gun making the barely audible "pewff" sound.
That's exactly what they think, why do you think they always refer to them as "Silencers" ? I still haven't understood how they can make the leap that a suppressed gun will somehow kill someone more than an un-suppressed one will. But then I don't live in the rainbow and unicorn world.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Gun control group claims suppressors are ‘threat to public safety’”
- Fri Feb 19, 2016 11:19 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Gun control group claims suppressors are ‘threat to public safety’
- Replies: 24
- Views: 3280
