Evidently no attorney has asked for an opinion on the zoo's.Glockster wrote:Yes but I thought for sure that there would be more. I am very surprised that for example, Houston zoo wasn't on there.Outnumbered wrote:I understood the link to be to a list of items pending for AG opinions, not the list of pending complaints against govt agencies posting 30.06
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Sheriff wants 30.06 signs on court house”
- Sat Dec 05, 2015 12:04 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Sheriff wants 30.06 signs on court house
- Replies: 42
- Views: 6843
Re: Sheriff wants 30.06 signs on court house
- Wed Dec 02, 2015 8:33 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Sheriff wants 30.06 signs on court house
- Replies: 42
- Views: 6843
Re: Sheriff wants 30.06 signs on court house
This is exactly what they have been doing for the past few years and they are mad because they can be fined for it now. They are acting like the law is something new, when it is not.dhoobler wrote:There is a pending opinion by the AG requested by Hays county DA Wes Mau to address this issue. Here is a link to Mau's request:nightmare69 wrote:He is wanting to post the entire county building when by law only the courtrooms themselves are off limits.
https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/op ... 0051KP.pdf
The Hays county DA claims that the county court house, which is a muti-use building, contains a court. As such, the entire building falls under the prohibition of TPC 46.03(A)(3) (which if true, no 30.06 sign is needed).
If Hays county is successful, SB 273 will become moot. Local governments can designate an office in each building to be "utilized by a court" and thus, the entire building is off-limits per 46.03(A)(3).