It won't stop a criminal. Why should I be penalized for something a criminal might wear? If I own such an item why should I be made a criminal without committing a criminal act?clarionite wrote:MeMelYup wrote:Instead of outlawing type 3 body armour they should provide a penalty for using it while committing a crime.Wasn't there a penalty for the original crime? It apparently didn't stop them from committing that crime.
I don't see the logic. It should be mandated that a criminal make it easier for himself to be killed if he fails to obey the law?
To me that makes about as much sense as thinking that a criminal will avoid carrying a firearm into a gun free zone because of the penalty for breaking that law, when they're going to commit a crime that has a penalty of 25 to life... or the death penalty.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “House Bill to Ban Body Armor for us peasants”
- Thu Feb 05, 2015 11:12 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: House Bill to Ban Body Armor for us peasants
- Replies: 27
- Views: 2785
Re: House Bill to Ban Body Armor for us peasants
- Thu Feb 05, 2015 11:01 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: House Bill to Ban Body Armor for us peasants
- Replies: 27
- Views: 2785
Re: House Bill to Ban Body Armor for us peasants
Instead of outlawing type 3 body armour they should provide a penalty for using it while committing a crime.