mr1337 wrote:Before we get too wound up on how responsible CHL holders are, and how irresponsible people without CHLs are, let's not forget that this law will affect visitors to our state as well. It may not be viable for someone from a state that does not have reciprocity to get a non-resident CHL. They might have unlicensed concealed carry in their state. They might have unlicensed open carry in their state. They may live in a state where it's neigh impossible to get a license to carry. Do they not deserve the right of self defense when they are here? As long as they're not a felon, they should be able to lawfully carry. Openly or concealed - at least give them a choice.
Also, Texas has one of the most expensive concealed licensing in the country. You're out over $200 by the time you mail your materials in. I can see some people who equally deserve the right of self defense not being able to afford that right away. Could you imagine paying $200 for a license to vote?
I fail to understand how people who believe in the 2nd Amendment accept conditions that severely infringe on some people's right to bear arms. And I certainly don't think that a Constitutional right needs to be turned into a licensed activity. At least, if it is, give an option where one can practice those rights without a licencing requirement. Licensing creates barriers for legitimate, law-abiding citizens, and there's no denial of that.
