TexasCHLforum.com

flintknapper wrote:

Not much to ponder, once it's been said and heard, notice has been given. You can't unhear it.

Yes, I am not arguing the mechanics of the notice, just not certain that notice given is 'permanent' or would not be required each time a person entered an establishment that has no sign or a non-compliant sign since one element required to make it an arrest-able offense is refusal to 'leave'.

I don't want to take this thread off course and discuss that here, but I can certainly imagine some savvy lawyers being able to make a good case for that.

No doubt, this will eventually end up in court. I will NOT be present, I can assure you.

flintknapper wrote:

The problem is, if you/I make it a point to receive verbal notification in place of an invalid sign, there is a strong possibility that the notice you/I receive will be sufficient to prevent any type of carry forever in that establishment for you/I.

Yes Sir, I concede that is a possibility. The likelihood....I don't know, but you might be correct.

Verbal notice is permanent.

Not entirely convinced of this yet, but I am pondering it.

flintknapper wrote:

You keep saying they would have to put up compliant signs.

No, I keep saying they would need to put up 'compliant' signs in order to avoid the necessary LEGAL 'next step' of informing with respect to force of law.

I don't know how to get you to read with more comprehension? I will endeavor to be abundantly clear.

Thanks,

Flint.

Edited to add 'force of law'