Reminds me of a conversation I had with my dad 30+ years ago. I had found out who was representing him in a court case. I knew the name, and his reputation. I was concerned and asked my dad if he knew of his reputation as a crooked lawyer. He said he did, and that was why he hired him. He'd rather have him crooked for him, than crooked against him. LOLKeith B wrote: ↑Sat Jun 29, 2019 6:17 pm When I was a LEO we had a local criminal defense attorney who had very low morals, had no issues cheating, twisting the truth, and would do whatever it took to make us look bad and his client look like a choirboy. He was ruthless in his methods and had no issue lying, cheating or ruining your reputation to win. I didn’t like him as a person, and didn’t like his lack of scruples. However, I made it clear that if I was ever in need of services like he provided that he would be the first one I would want to represent me.
I don’t like a lot of things our current Commander in Chief does, but I still think he was the best choice for the job we had to choose from that could beat Hitlery.
Bottom line, if Charles says this is the guy for the job, then I believe him 110% and support the choice.
Search found 1 match
Return to “An Important Message to NRA Members”
- Tue Jul 02, 2019 3:47 pm
- Forum: National Rifle Association
- Topic: An Important Message to NRA Members
- Replies: 67
- Views: 80244