I'm coming out of lurk mode (normal for me) because I am curious. This entire thread has had only responses that deal with the type of dog, or how the owner may or may not be responsible, but the most important part is ignored.RPB wrote:Gun Owner Saves Boy from Pit Bull Attack! Wait … Police Say His Actions Could be ‘Criminal’ ?
January 23, 2013 2:21PM
http://www.cato.org/blog/gun-owner-save ... e-criminal" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
DC neighborhood
Forget all about the dogs. Instead, think about the person who used his gun to save a boy from an attack and now could face criminal charges! Of course this is in DC and we all know the mind set of those in power there but the fact that they are even thinking of charging this man should bother each person here.
I don't care what type of dog was involved, I do care that the United Kingdom mentality is alive and growing in our country where to defend yourself or someone else can be considered a criminal activity.
YMMV and all that... just saying.
Phill
</lurkmode back on>