I completely agree that no one in their right mind should tell a business that their signage is not compliant. I don't know if that happened in this case.Oldgringo wrote:One mo' time:Embalmo wrote:I can't help but wonder if some CHL's letter caused/helped this to happen. I sincerely hope that a memo isn't going out to all the locations from corporate instructing them to and how to make their signs compliant.
I sincerely worry that compliant signs might start popping up everywhere once business owners learn that their signs need to be posted in a specific way. Let's not help the other side.
Embalmo
Enbalmo's concerns are real and they are germane to CC in Texas.
A CHL is not a Batman License nor is it any kind of crusader's badge that demands the posters of non compliant 30.06 signs be righteously notified of their invalid signs by new or old or any Texas CH licensees. Let's let sleeping dogs lie, mind our own business and go on about our rounds secure in the knowledge that we are legal and we know what we're about even if those around us haven't a clue.
I also don't see any logical way that a business will figure out that their sign is not compliant by a CHL holder telling them that the sign is keeping the CHL holder from carrying in that establishment. If anything this would only reinforce the business owner's mistaken belief that their sign is legit.
We will probably just need to agree to disagree on this point.
