The NRA is going to score the contempt vote
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... -on-holder
I don't know that any of the democrats in the committee have a NRA rating that will go down because of their contempt vote but there are plenty in the full House of Reps.
Search found 8 matches
Return to “‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......”
- Wed Jun 20, 2012 5:42 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......
- Replies: 96
- Views: 13005
- Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:35 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......
- Replies: 96
- Views: 13005
Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....
Well that article was interesting.
According to Judge Napolitano if Executive Privilege applies then Attorney General Holder lied to congress. (Who is Roger Clements?)Napolitano concluded, “If the president was not personally involved, executive privilege doesn’t apply. If the president was personally involved, and they want to argue that fighting drug gangs at the border is a matter of sensitive national security, then they at least have an argument for executive privilege but that would be at odds with what Attorney General Holder has already testified to under oath.”
- Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:20 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......
- Replies: 96
- Views: 13005
Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....
I think the drip-drip-drip of disclosure is better than getting it all over with at once.
If Holder had said that it was his fault and resigned when this first came out, it wouldn't have affected the upcoming presidential election.
Hopefully it will get resolved just in time for 0bama to have to explain in time to loose a few more votes.
If Holder had said that it was his fault and resigned when this first came out, it wouldn't have affected the upcoming presidential election.
Hopefully it will get resolved just in time for 0bama to have to explain in time to loose a few more votes.
- Tue Jun 19, 2012 8:03 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......
- Replies: 96
- Views: 13005
Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....
earlier this month, I said:
The senate does not prosecute contempt of congress. The justice department prosecutes it.
That would be interesting.
If the House charges Holder with Contempt of Congress, then Holder will have to prosecute.
I now believe I was mistaken.The drip-drip-drip of news stories on Holder and fast & furious gun running continues.
I stand by my prediction that the drips will continue until the November 6th election or Holder resigns and that he will never be convicted of Contempt because of the Democrat controlled Senate.
The senate does not prosecute contempt of congress. The justice department prosecutes it.
That would be interesting.
If the House charges Holder with Contempt of Congress, then Holder will have to prosecute.
- Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:02 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......
- Replies: 96
- Views: 13005
Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....
Just another observation:
Charles Krauthammer commented yesterday that the Fast & Furious scandal will not cost Obama any votes. Folks that care about guns aren't going to vote for him anyway.
Charles Krauthammer commented yesterday that the Fast & Furious scandal will not cost Obama any votes. Folks that care about guns aren't going to vote for him anyway.
- Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:59 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......
- Replies: 96
- Views: 13005
Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....
The drip-drip-drip of news stories on Holder and fast & furious gun running continues.
I stand by my prediction that the drips will continue until the November 6th election or Holder resigns and that he will never be convicted of Contempt because of the Democrat controlled Senate.
I stand by my prediction that the drips will continue until the November 6th election or Holder resigns and that he will never be convicted of Contempt because of the Democrat controlled Senate.
- Thu Jun 07, 2012 5:48 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......
- Replies: 96
- Views: 13005
Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....
I agree with Oldgringo
You're being too kind in your opinion of Eric Holder.
Here's to 1/20/2013 when "Anybody but Obama" takes over the Oval Office.
You're being too kind in your opinion of Eric Holder.
Here's to 1/20/2013 when "Anybody but Obama" takes over the Oval Office.
- Thu Jun 07, 2012 5:26 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......
- Replies: 96
- Views: 13005
Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....
I am trying to be kind to the Republicans in the house.
They aren't impeaching Holder or holding him in contempt because either action would fail in the Democrat held senate.
AND
They want the lying and stalling to continue until November 6th. So it will be an issue for Pro-Gun folks to consider in the election.
I am willing to read Fast and Furious news stories from now until Holder (and Obama) leave office.
Your mileage may vary.
They aren't impeaching Holder or holding him in contempt because either action would fail in the Democrat held senate.
AND
They want the lying and stalling to continue until November 6th. So it will be an issue for Pro-Gun folks to consider in the election.
I am willing to read Fast and Furious news stories from now until Holder (and Obama) leave office.
Your mileage may vary.