Maybe there weren't officers available sooner because they were busy at checkpoints.
In addition to the drunks, I would like to see the cops arrest people driving without licenses and insurance. That's a big problem in the Houston area.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “Field sobriety test”
- Tue Apr 19, 2011 5:29 pm
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Field sobriety test
- Replies: 103
- Views: 12530
- Sat Jan 15, 2011 5:09 pm
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Field sobriety test
- Replies: 103
- Views: 12530
Re: Field sobriety test
If you have nothing to hide, why should police need a warrant before searching your house?reality99 wrote:I don't understand why people are so defensive about talking to an officer. Their jobs are hard enough without people giving them the run around. Regarding consenting to a breathalyzer, if you haven't been drinking you have nothing to worry about.
- Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:37 pm
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Field sobriety test
- Replies: 103
- Views: 12530
Re: Field sobriety test
In Houston, it seems like politicians and sports celebrities get even more special consideration.Oldgringo wrote:So!
All of those signs and instructions urging us not to 'drink and drive' mean, "Don't drink and Drive", if you don't have lots of money.
- Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:32 pm
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Field sobriety test
- Replies: 103
- Views: 12530
Re: Field sobriety test
A search can be authorized with a warrant but you still have the right to not be forced to incriminate yourself, and a simple reading of the fifth amendment shows it doesn't limit the scope to speech.