Note that the phrases used "Common sense gun laws" and "reasonable restrictions" are part of the terminology of the people who seek to [gun] control us rather than allow us to live as free men and women. The use of these phrases might appear to indicate a certain level of acceptance of their methods and agenda, perhaps through their time honored braying long and hard to anyone who will listen. I know anygunanywhere used these phrases in contempt, and appreciate that, but I make a habit of not using such Liberty-averse turns of phrase without identifying them somehow as lacking validity from my perspective.Common sense gun laws and reasonable restrictions are the knife cuts that are slowly bleeding our RKBA to death.
FWIW, I believe in my heart that firearms SAFETY training is important enough to possibly consider mandating in public schooling. While we are at it, it might be a good idea to mandate a semester or two of shop class so kids can learn to do more than push a button with their digits without hurting themselves or someone else around them. Firearms proficiency training is another thing entirely. It IS definitely important, particularly for someone who considers themselves responsible and therefore worthy of a life of liberty. To mandate proficiency training, though, is to once again put restrictions on a fundamental right.