TexasCHLforum.com

The foundation of their arguments is that no person can be trusted with any tool of force -- and we need government/laws to protect us from such things. They recognize avarice in their own hearts and don't trust THEMSELVES with tools of force, so no one else should have them either. They can only make this argument because they are the self-described "enlightened", who always act in the best interests of mankind. As such, THEY are the only worthy folks to make policy decisions and their policies are the only ones worth anything. All other ideas are simply wrong.

Of course, these "correct" ideas are counter to individual liberty and common sense, so I'll not be trusting them any time soon. When force is the only option, it pays to have that option.