TexasCHLforum.com

Charles L. Cotton wrote:I'm not saying issues other than guns are not important, but I am saying a candidate's stand on guns is a litmus test. If they are wrong on guns, there's no reason for me to look any further. Chas.

Agree completely. Any candidate must pass that test first, then I'll look deeper. A "nyet" vote there and they are out... no recovering from that failure. This article sums up my position http://www.lneilsmith.org/whyguns.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. I have no issues with anything in that article.