So we have 1 for nothing changing. Unless it causes a place like Vermont to get a CHL program, that's a step back.a) They already already do. Arizona does, Places like Vermont who have constitutional carry aren't allowed to carry in another state because they don't have a CHL program, Nothing really changes from the current state of affairs
2 for nothing changing... unless the states which are moderate and still have CHL now ditch it due to the force reciprocity.b) States that are so much against CHL carry and reciprocity don't have much recpricrocity now, Things can't get any worse in states we can't carry now .. New York Illinois and Mass. etc...
Say vermont opens up chl program to get reciprocity... but no background check, no shooting test, good for 1000 years... Think there won't be an uproar from the rest of us? Previously if a state had a joke of a chl program just don't honor the thing. Guess what the easiest solution here is? We don't need to be laying out a red carpet for the fed's to step in on this because they will.c) Where does this come from the FUD about Nationalizing Registry and Natioanl CHL licensing was nothing to do with this bill.
By this reasoning what do we actually gain? Anything?
I don't care what bloomerburg thinks. I just call them how I see them. I won't let my "gunmetal colored glasses" prevent me from seeing that this will only force us further down the same old road.Being a gun owner and being on the side of the Bloomburgs Illegal mayors and against the NRA, sorta says it all.
If Bloomburg is against a gun bill, It has to ba a good thing.
