TexasCHLforum.com

dhoobler wrote:

Dave2 wrote:

dhoobler wrote:Trump was not my first, or even second choice. In a race between Hillary and anyone, I am going to vote for Hillary’s opponent unless her opponent is Satan.

Between those two, I'd vote for Satan... He's more likely to mess up the country less, and everyone knows what he's about so - for once - everyone would actually read every word of every bill before sending it to him and congress would take their authority back from the presidency.

In a race between Hillary an Satan, I would probably not vote. I have to admit that you make a convincing argument here.

Seeing as how it's unlikely Satan will ever appear on a ballot, I'm quite glad this will remain a purely hypothetical* discussion. The antichrist, though... well the trouble is I really doubt they'll openly use that title, at least at first... So who is it? Given his (or her... I can't recall if the Bible specifies a gender) predicted political prowess, I'd probably have to go with Clinton. Heh, I never thought I'd find a way to justify voting for her.

*I might claim it's a not-entirely-meritless argument against the traditional "vote for the lesser of two evils" strategy, though.

Mxrdad wrote:I agree. Wait,... I'm pretty sure "She" and Satan one and the same????

Lol

Plus, I bet democrats would suddenly start swearing oaths on the 10th amendment.

dhoobler wrote:Trump was not my first, or even second choice. In a race between Hillary and anyone, I am going to vote for Hillary’s opponent unless her opponent is Satan.

Between those two, I'd vote for Satan... He's more likely to mess up the country less, and everyone knows what he's about so - for once - everyone would actually read every word of every bill before sending it to him and congress would take their authority back from the presidency.