You can get a 3rd party frame... can't remember where though.goose wrote:Having worked on a sub-2k to take the G19 magazines, the thought has crossed my mind. And I really do like the idea. BUT emotionally it feels 100 times more difficult to carve on a Glock frame than a Kel-Tec. And I'm not dissing the Kel-Tec but one was (when we bought ours) a $240 frame and one is a $500 frame. A few more years to soak up with the teenaged boys. After they leave the nest and my dollars free up a skosh, this might be pretty high on my list.locke_n_load wrote:Just buy a G17 and cut the grip down to accept G26 mags.goose wrote:This kind of logic will NOT be tolerated around here! :-)Jago668 wrote:Why not just carry a G26, and then spare G17 mags?
Although I will admit a wish to take this the other direction. I'd like a 17 slide on my 26 lower. Nice sight radius, small handle above my belt. The product shown kind of does this but with the added bonus of a really compromised grip and a need to assemble. I also assume that it comes with a belt clip because I can't imagine that bad boy in a holster or IWB.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “80% Glock - deep concealment”
- Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:20 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 80% Glock - deep concealment
- Replies: 24
- Views: 5396
Re: 80% Glock - deep concealment
- Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:17 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 80% Glock - deep concealment
- Replies: 24
- Views: 5396
Re: 80% Glock - deep concealment
I don't want to CC a gun I need to assemble. Might be handy as a survival gun for hiking or something where minimum size & weight are more important than ease of deployment, I guess.