Well, there's constitutional amendments, but good luck getting one of those passed in our current political climate.The Annoyed Man wrote:But that is the Senate. SCOTUS can be far more insidious, because against them, The People have almost no electoral recourse. . . . .particularly since Harry Reid's Senate advises and consents on their nominations. SCOTUS is accountable to nobody; not even to the Senate that places them in office. In that environment, Bond v. U.S. ought to scare the pants off of anyone who loves individual liberty.
Search found 1 match
Return to “A case before SCOTUS: Federalism vs 10th Amendment”
- Sat Nov 09, 2013 2:20 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: A case before SCOTUS: Federalism vs 10th Amendment
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2226