Well, I suppose if said leak ends up constituting treason and it occurs during wartime... I think that'd have to be a pretty unique set of circumstances, though.Jaguar wrote:Looks like the ATF has a new method for dealing with whistleblowers. A firing squad.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... ing-squad/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The Washington Times wrote:...the Justice Department finds itself on the defensive after a training manual surfaced that suggests federal agents could face a firing squad for leaking government secrets.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “ATF tries to block whistleblowing agent’s Fast and Furious b”
- Wed Oct 16, 2013 10:11 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ATF tries to block whistleblowing agent’s Fast and Furious b
- Replies: 16
- Views: 2714
Re: ATF tries to block whistleblowing agent’s Fast and Furio
- Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:01 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ATF tries to block whistleblowing agent’s Fast and Furious b
- Replies: 16
- Views: 2714
Re: ATF tries to block whistleblowing agent’s Fast and Furio
If the ATF is successful, I hope it'll end up on wikileaks or something.The Annoyed Man wrote:Well, I'd say that BATFE has made their move by trying to block publication; but the issue isn't over yet, so it IS blocked for now....until he has his day in court. Then it may not be blocked any longer. So, in this case, "IS" and "TRIES" are the same thing. It is only "IS" if it remains blocked.Abraham wrote:The title of this thread states: ATF "TRIES" to block, but the article states: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives "IS" blocking the main whistleblower...
So, which is it?