Liability laws. The officer was acting on behalf of the city, so the city pays for his or her mistakes. I'm not saying it should be this way, but AFAIK that's why it is.VMI77 wrote:Why punish the taxpayers instead of the officer? What would happen to any of us who drew down on someone open carrying?
Search found 1 match
Return to “Retired Army Vet Gets $15,000 From City”
- Thu Aug 15, 2013 12:11 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Retired Army Vet Gets $15,000 From City
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1157