40khammer wrote:BrianSW99 wrote:pbwalker wrote:That may be the case, but the fact that Walgreens acted on it is what bothers me. Businesses may *have* to put this in their manuals per legal. But they have the discretion to enforce it. If they want a no weapons policy at work, that is their right. But in this situation, where the pharmacist had to choose between life and death, he chose correctly. Walgreens did NOT have to fire him. If CVS were to do this, I would express the same outrage.
My $0.02
Looks like you better find some place beside CVS:
Pharmacist Fired From CVS for Using Gun to Thwart Robber
I'm never shopping anywhere again!
I know! It's hard to make a principled stand in a world where you can't even buy stuff that directly keeps you alive without violating your principles.
