C-dub wrote:I was with you up until this statement. Where else are governmental meetings held, but government property? However, I think the actual meeting room is the only thing off limits and not the entire building.Warhammer wrote: So even if they HAD gotten the 30.06 signs right, and even if it IS for a government meeting, the signs would be inapplicable because the property is owned or leased by the city.
My only question is what constitutes a "meeting?" Does two people getting together qualify as a meeting that cold prohibit a CHL from carrying? Supposing they would also properly post a 30.06 sign.
Section 30.06 explicitly states that the entire section is not applicable to buildings owned or leased by a goverment. It does not differentiate individual rooms within said buildings. Now, if the meeting was being held at the VFW, or at a church, or a convention center, or a hotel auditorium, or a performance hall, or a home... then a correct 30.06 sign would bar a CHL from carrying in the meeting.