TexasCHLforum.com

Cshuff21 wrote:Correct me if i am wrong but if a homeowner feels threatened on his own property whether CHL or not he doesn't have to ask questions first. True? I'm not saying in this case in particular but. If I am wrong please let me know but that's how I figure it

He has to be able to articulate why he was in fear of death or serious bodily injury unless he meets one of the exceptions where he is "presumed reasonable", like robbery, kidnapping, etc. Classicly, one would articulate means, motive, and opportunity when describing this fear so that a "reasonable person" would agree. The "reasonable people" on this particular jury obviously did not buy his story.