I'd rank Ruger ahead of Kimber, Colt, and Para as well. However, I'd rank Springfield Armory ahead of Ruger.Sidro wrote:At this time I own the 1911 from several different makers. The way they are listed is how I would rate them.
1. Fusion Firearms $2200
2. Ruger $700
3. Kimber custom target II $1400
4. Kimber ultra carry II $1100
5. Colt 70 series
6. Para $1200 and $1000
Just my opinion but for the money I think you can't beat the Ruger. Just because they cost more does not mean they are better all the time. The Fusion is in 357sig but all the rest are .45acp.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Recommendations for 1911 (under $1000)”
- Sun Jun 23, 2013 4:56 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Recommendations for 1911 (under $1000)
- Replies: 36
- Views: 7441
Re: Recommendations for 1911 (under $1000)
- Thu Jun 20, 2013 6:01 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Recommendations for 1911 (under $1000)
- Replies: 36
- Views: 7441
Re: Recommendations for 1911 (under $1000)
I'll jump on the Springfield Armory bandwagon. Last time I bought a "Loaded" model with night sights, it was under $750 shipped through my FFL.
One reason for Springfield over Ruger, the low end STI's, and many of the other 1911's under $1,000 is Springfield Armory's has a forged receiver and slide, where other people are using cast.
One reason for Springfield over Ruger, the low end STI's, and many of the other 1911's under $1,000 is Springfield Armory's has a forged receiver and slide, where other people are using cast.