That is what Ohio does. Attorney General publishes a "Concealed Carry Handbook". The CHL affirms under penalty of perjury that they have downloaded and reviewed the current pamphlet as part of the application.Purplehood wrote:I think that renewal "classes" should be an online review of current laws related to the CHL and an e-signature affirming that you have read them.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “HB48: No renewal class required”
- Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:13 pm
- Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB48: No renewal class required
- Replies: 72
- Views: 37818
Re: HB48: No renewal class required
- Wed Mar 06, 2013 1:47 pm
- Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB48: No renewal class required
- Replies: 72
- Views: 37818
Re: HB48: No renewal class required
There are many states that do not require renewal training, and I am not aware of any evidence or data showing it reduces public safety or creates additional unjustified shootings in those states. So dropping government-required renewal training is fine with me.
I have personally chosen to continue with periodic training for my own benefit, but there is a world of difference between personal efforts and government-mandated efforts.
I have personally chosen to continue with periodic training for my own benefit, but there is a world of difference between personal efforts and government-mandated efforts.