C-dub wrote:Maybe I'm not sure what you mean when you say they do not have the force of law. I frequently travel to Kansas and thought they did when they meet specific requirements.steveincowtown wrote:Signs have no force of law in Kansas, so I would love to see TX catch up. Hopefully this is considered in new bills for the upcoming TX session.
http://ag.ks.gov/docs/default-source/do ... f?sfvrsn=6" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I believe your link only relates to "state and municipal" buildings.
http://www.handgunlaw.us/states/kansas.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Page 6...
If TX would take the teeth out of 30.06 and make it a simple trespass charge we could end the conflicts about the signs issue. Signs not having the force of law is true in many states. It makes things much easier for everyone.