Return to “Obama May Change His Mind On Assault Weapons Ban”
Bwahhh....greatness!RottenApple wrote:Why on earth would anyone want a bear car???steveincowtown wrote:Your comparison would hold true if the constitution guaranteed the right to bear cars.
[ Image ]
Sorry. I just had to lighten things up a bit.
Your comparison would hold true if the constitution guaranteed the right to bear cars.Stripes Dude wrote:No need to be condescending. Sometimes, people have different opinions on how problems should be solved. If in your life, there are no differing opinions, then congratulations on being able to surround yourself with like minded people. But don't be rude, asking rhetorical questions. Besides, paying for a BG check to transfer a gun to your daughter is no different than paying to transfer a car title.baldeagle wrote:It doesn't infuriate me. It just makes me shake my head. Do you realize what you are saying? If I want to sell a firearm to my daughter, under that scenario, I would have to pay for a background check. Does that even make sense to you? Because it if does, I think you need to think about it a little more clearly. Would you mind if the government checked your background before you sold your house? Your car? Any other possession? NONE of those things are constitutionally protected. Guns are. Yet you would allow an intrusion that you would never think of allowing for mere possessions.Stripes Dude wrote:Reading this eased my fears a bit.
I personally have no issue with strengthening background checks, eliminating private sales without a BG check (that may infuriate some here)
It's no wonder America is in trouble when we've departed so far from an understanding of the Constitution.
