AEA said: "One thing that may help is the slap in the face that SCOTUS will hand them in about 3 weeks with the ruling on Health Care. They won't get the message though, they will just look for another run-around to reach their goals."
From your lips to G_d's ear.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......”
- Sat Jun 09, 2012 10:23 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......
- Replies: 96
- Views: 13008
- Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:56 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......
- Replies: 96
- Views: 13008
Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....
Holder is largely responsible for the Mark Rich and FALN terrorist pardons under Clinton. Holder's bad character was already visible. He was a known quantity when Obama nominated him. Yet many Republican senators were on board for his confirmation. My disgust is aimed mostly at those senators. Bringing it a little closer to home, neither Cornyn nor Hutchison have been outstanding senators for Texas. Although they tend to follow the party in voting, they have not been leaders. I'd like to see Texas getting a little more bang for its buck in the Senate in terms of leadership. I'm not talking about leadership positions, I'm talking about legislative leadership. We have an opportunity this year as we replace Kay Bailey. As big as it is, Texas deserves some better representation. I don't think it's enough just to be a dependable cipher.