TexasCHLforum.com

Speaking of bio-engineering using SARS-CoV-1:

In this report, we review and discuss these three different approaches developed for building CoV infectious cDNAs by using SARS-CoV as a model

Virus Research - 2014

TomV wrote: ↑Sun Apr 19, 2020 12:26 pm A dissenting opinion based on science.

https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus ... D0KOx5WBhA

from the article:

"If someone were seeking to engineer a new coronavirus as a pathogen, they would have constructed it from the backbone of a virus known to cause illness," according to a statement from Scripps.

SARS-CoV-2 is 80% identical to SARS-CoV-1...SARS-CoV-1 is well known to cause illness so I am struggling to see how SARS-CoV-2 is not 80% similar to "a virus known to cause illness".

The Level 4 biolab in Wuhan was set up to research SARS-CoV-1 and other corona-viruses.

The "associate" professor's other argument is that his computer model doesn't suggest that SARS-CoV-2 would work well. That's a weak argument if I've ever heard one.

I don't have to be a bio-engineer to know that a virus that is 80% SARS + another coronavirus + HIV was made in a lab.

But I do very much appreciate Montagnier and Jean-Claude Perez for publicly confirming what should be obvious to all.

Next up is accountability, and I don't trust the globalists anymore than I trust the ChiComs.