TexasCHLforum.com

Odinvalknir wrote: ↑Thu Feb 14, 2019 12:30 am I still haven't figured out why these people can't understand a simple truth.

Most mass shooters either

1. Don't buy the weapons they use
2. Don't follow the laws already on the books (obviously)
3. Could just pack many extra magazines and ammo for reloading so it negates the law banning "high capacity" magazines.

Actually, a lot of them do buy the weapons they use and pass the NICS background check, which makes you wonder what exactly the anti's are trying to stop with "universal background checks". I'm not aware of any mass shooting where a universal background check would have prevented the shooter from acquiring the firearm used in the shooting.

I believe some have also acquired them through straw purchases. Others took/stole them from their parents.

Jusme wrote: ↑Wed Feb 13, 2019 7:49 pm They do realize that the shooter could have had 5 round mags, and still killed just as many people, because of the incompetence, and cowardice if the BCSO,. And since he was never convicted of a felony, would not have been prevented from purchasing his gun. Oh yeah... It's Democrats, logic, doesn't factor in, as long as they can get their subjects to submit.

I thought I read that the Parkland shooter only used 10 round magazines because the 30 rounders took up too much room in his backpack?