Not sure I agree. I guess the devil is in the details, but how is this any different from the argument the gay marriage advocates were making that a marriage license in one state has to be recognized in all states under the Full Faith and Credit clause? If the courts want to be consistent, then the courts should just order that all states recognize other states CHL's - period, end of discussion. Then we don't have to worry about a Schumer-type politician mucking it up with some silly loophole or restrictions that are bound to be in any law that's passed.tlt wrote:Are you sure, really sure you want to give the Federal Government the ability to regulate the carrying of arms. Remember, virtually ALL federal property is a gun free zone, regardless of party in power. I would certainly encourage the states to get together on this, as previously mentioned Texas can push this along by suspending unilateral agreements if the state refuses to propose a pathway to a bilateral agreement. This will not happen, because in the end, all the politicians protect their own interests first, not the peoples.
By willingly giving the Feds jurisdiction over this, you essentially lose your rights, states rights.
The Tenth Amendment (Amendment X) to the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791.[1] It expresses the principle of federalism, which strictly supports the entire plan of the original Constitution of the United States of America, by stating that the federal government possesses only those powers delegated to it by the United States Constitution. All remaining powers are reserved for the states or the people. source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Ame ... nstitution
Search found 1 match
Return to “Donald Trump supports national reciprocity law”
- Wed Dec 30, 2015 1:14 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Donald Trump supports national reciprocity law
- Replies: 18
- Views: 2057