Search found 2 matches
Return to “"Gunsplaining" is apparently offensive to liberal gun grabbers.”
- Thu Mar 08, 2018 1:32 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: "Gunsplaining" is apparently offensive to liberal gun grabbers.
- Replies: 25
- Views: 6543
Re: "Gunsplaining" is apparently offensive to liberal gun grabbers.
Our mission isn't to convert the gun banners, Their minds are all ready made up. I just hope to explain to our side, the truth and the unreasonableness of the banners
- Thu Mar 08, 2018 6:39 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: "Gunsplaining" is apparently offensive to liberal gun grabbers.
- Replies: 25
- Views: 6543
Re: "Gunsplaining" is apparently offensive to liberal gun grabbers.
The thing is that the banners want to ban something they have to be specific and technical to describe exactly what they want to ban. The "I know it when I see it" doesn't work well in our legal system. The Mad Mommy and company goals aren't to eliminate a single rifle platform but to eliminate as broad of a base as they possibly can. The current democratic gun ban bill is proof of this scope creep. Which basically strives to eliminate every modern gun. except mouseguns, and ancient designs like 1911s and revolvers. Soon they will go after those.
If they are going to call for the elimination of something they need to explain what the features are that they want to eliminate. How does a shroud or adjustable stock make a weapon more dangerous to the public? Why is a Glock 17 more of a public threat than a 1911 platform? To understand all this and the targets of the banners we need to get technical. They certainly have in their bills.
I wrote a post in my blog, that does 'gunsplain' a little about the AR15 and I try to dispell some of the mistruths about the AR-15 and related platforms.
If they are going to call for the elimination of something they need to explain what the features are that they want to eliminate. How does a shroud or adjustable stock make a weapon more dangerous to the public? Why is a Glock 17 more of a public threat than a 1911 platform? To understand all this and the targets of the banners we need to get technical. They certainly have in their bills.
I wrote a post in my blog, that does 'gunsplain' a little about the AR15 and I try to dispell some of the mistruths about the AR-15 and related platforms.