NotRPB wrote:Is CERT really likely to need this exemption?
not being sarcastic, the answer is I don't know what cannot be anticipated or foreseen
I have no idea, I wouldn't have imagined a fireman getting shot last week either though
I firmly support that a firefighter or ems personal shouldn't need to look for 30.06 signs before rushing into a building.
NotRPB wrote:
If a building collapses on people and there's a 30.06 sign at what was the entrance, do you need to store your gun in a gunsafe in the car before running in to clear debris and swat rattlesnakes in it away from trapped people?
This was the type of answer I was looking for. Thanks! It dawned on me after I posted that staging is often done at schools or even courthouses.
NotRPB wrote:
I have no idea what "needs" are that cannot be anticipated, why would there be a "NEED" to prohibit or to NOT be armed should be the question when depriving one of a right to defend themselves with a constitutionally protected RKBA tool
We also need to be careful whenb carving out exceptions for certain people. HB435 seems like a good thing to me, but it also deserves some scrutiny when exeptions are being carved out for a certain few. My understanding of the types of responces that CERT responds is limited.