or maybe ...rssecurity wrote:.
While I know of no precedent for 30.06/30.07/51% signs, there are other precedents for minor, insignificant, errors costing people their case. I also consider that in all the years at least 30.06 has been around, there are no precedents. Why not? I have to believe that it has to have come up by now. I can think of two reasons:
1 - The DA's look at these cases, realize they'll likely lose, and don't prosecute, or lose in court.
2 - No LTC who has lost has bothered to appeal. Since it was a class A misdemeanor, which is just below a felony conviction, that seems less likely.
3- No one has been caught. It's unlikely that the very few licensed folk would cross a legitimate sign would be caught if their gun were properly concealed.