i while I believe that felons deserve an oportunity to to at least earn the right. The constitution doesn't exempt felons in the 2nd ammendment, nor does it exempt crazies, However this is a different point and off topic.Lucky45 wrote:Can you answer the direct question about a felon who is whole that has been "rehabilatated" in prison and is released. They are denied posessing a gun. Are their lives of less important?? Now remember you can be a felon for many different reasons, not just robbery or murder.Liberty wrote: By denying thre crazies we would put less importance on their lifes than on those of us who may be more whole.
The difference between a felon and a crazy is that the felon has proven by their actions they are untrustworthy. They are judge by a system that has checks and balances.
What makes someone crazy is how they think. If they do something wrong and break the rules they should lose the appropriate rights. Someone is crazy because they think differently than the norm.
Some people thought Audie Murphy and Douglas MacArthur were crazy. Should they have been disarmed? Who is to make the judgment? doctors and psychologist? Those guys are amongst the craziest of folks. Did you read about the gynecologist in this thread that asked in a form if their was a gun in the house? Sounded a little obsessive to me.