a) They already already do. Arizona does, Places like Vermont who have constitutional carry aren't allowed to carry in another state because they don't have a CHL program, Nothing really changes from the current state of affairstexasmusic wrote:Anyone want my uninformed opinion?
a) States with no licensing like alaska get one so they can be reciprocal.
b) States that don't want to be reciprocal trash their CHL.
c) National registry and chl licensing.
or
d) all of the above.
Feel free to tear my theories apart. I'll read up on this some more when I have time.
edit: i'm not trying to being sarcastic here... if I'm wrong here let me have it
b) States that are so much against CHL carry and reciprocity don't have much recpricrocity now, Things can't get any worse in states we can't carry now .. New York Illinois and Mass. etc...
c) Where does this come from the FUD about Nationalizing Registry and Natioanl CHL licensing was nothing to do with this bill.
Being a gun owner and being on the side of the Bloomburgs Illegal mayors and against the NRA, sorta says it all.
If Bloomburg is against a gun bill, It has to ba a good thing.