While I agree with you, I value the 1st ammendment just as much as the 2nd. Both are absolutely essential for our Safety and freedom. If we have one candidate that has disrespected and worked against the freedoms of speech and of the press, and another that the second ammendment, then I suppose the only other option would to vote for neither.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Then welcome Senator Rick "I hate guns" Noriega to Washington. I'm not a single issue voter either, but a candidate's position on guns is a litmus test. If they are wrong on that issue, then they oppose my ability to protect myself and my family and that's unacceptable, even if I agree with every other thing they support or oppose. If I have two pro-gun candidates running, then I get to look at other issues when deciding how to vote. Likewise, if I have two anti-gun candidates (never happened to me), then I make my decision on other issues. But when one candidate supports my right and ability to defend myself and my family and one does not, then the issue is settled at that point.
I too hate the bailout, but my safety comes first, then my money.
Chas.
There is always Slow Wheat, or maybe even Libertarian.