That's ok - I just remember because I was thinking that pretty much ANYBODY in the room would be more qualified ...sjfcontrol wrote:Yeah, I was working from (faulty) memory.terryg wrote:fixed it for yasjfcontrol wrote:Yep! That's what they think. "Guns are dangerous. I am the only one professional enough that I know of in this room to handle this Glock 40."
Search found 3 matches
Return to “OH - LEO Notification goes BAD, really BAD.”
- Sat Jul 30, 2011 7:50 pm
- Forum: Other States
- Topic: OH - LEO Notification goes BAD, really BAD.
- Replies: 189
- Views: 27938
Re: OH - LEO Notification goes BAD, really BAD.
- Sat Jul 30, 2011 2:55 pm
- Forum: Other States
- Topic: OH - LEO Notification goes BAD, really BAD.
- Replies: 189
- Views: 27938
Re: OH - LEO Notification goes BAD, really BAD.
fixed it for yasjfcontrol wrote:Yep! That's what they think. "Guns are dangerous. I am the only one professional enough that I know of in this room to handle this Glock 40."
- Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:51 am
- Forum: Other States
- Topic: OH - LEO Notification goes BAD, really BAD.
- Replies: 189
- Views: 27938
Re: OH - LEO Notification goes BAD, really BAD.
I agree - charges should be filled. He essentially threatened to kill the guy multiple times. Perhaps terroristic threats, professional suppression ...SQLGeek wrote:Would it be over the line to think this officer should face charges for making threats? He clearly is not thinking with any sort of a clear head and by the end of this video, I think he's realizing that everything he said is on tape. He is just the type that does not need to be wearing a badge.
That, plus massive 4th amendment abuses ...
No, I am 100% pro LEO - but this guy needs more than just to lose his badge.