TexasCHLforum.com

austinrealtor wrote: you can't legally exclude Glock owners from a thread unless you post effective notice in the thread using this exact language in extra large type.

"Pursuant to the inability of people in this thread to recognize superior engineering, only subpar makes of firearms will be discussed in this thread."

That's awesome!

austinrealtor wrote:Have a Glock in all three sizes. Share holsters, mags, same grip angle, trigger position and pull on each.

I almost excluded Glock owners from the post. Not to be a Glock hater or anything. But many Glock owners have mulitple models and we know how similar the models are.

USA1 wrote:I believe this can actually be a smart and beneficial thing.
Same controls, same safeties, in the same places.

Being familiar with one platform may be the best thing in a bad situation.
If you build muscle memory, then you don't have to think about which gun you're operating.

.45mac.40 wrote:
... TWINS, but ... one is smaller ! Good idea, like USA1 said.
Same ammo.
BUT... if N, you go to the range, it could get alittle boring, shootin' the same ole' caliber ?! ( just saying )

Mac .45 > > >>>>>> # %%% #

That's exactly what I was thinking. You would know your weapons very well - but variety is the spice of life ...

I wonder if anybody out there likes a particular brand/model so much that they have both a full size (for home defense) and a subcompact (for concealed carry). I can also see equipping the full size model with a light or some such.

Maybe its a silly question, I was just wondering ...