Preferablly it would be one of the hausfrau's wanting action making that demand.Ruark wrote:I was just joking, the point being that "ban all guns" would need to include strolling into the next Los Zetas meeting and telling them all to turn'em over.VMI77 wrote:And why would you be willing to make that deal? I wouldn't. You think the Zetas, Crips, MS13 and the like are going to stop being criminals if they temporarily don't have guns? You prepared to take on 3 or 4 guys with baseball bats or knives with your fists?Ruark wrote:Weeeelllllll, I'll tellya what. You go into all the hoods in cities like LA, Detroit, Miami, Chicago, St. Louis, the Texas border towns, etc. and get EVERY ONE of the Crips, Bloods, MS13s, Los Zetas, H. Angels, Mongols, Outlaws, Bandidos, psychiatric patients, felons, etc. to turn in all their guns, then I'll turn in mine. Deal?baldeagle wrote:Ban guns. All guns.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “The Cognitive Dissonance is Strong With This One”
- Tue Dec 15, 2015 10:52 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: The Cognitive Dissonance is Strong With This One
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5230
Re: The Cognitive Dissonance is Strong With This One
- Mon Dec 14, 2015 9:53 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: The Cognitive Dissonance is Strong With This One
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5230
Re: The Cognitive Dissonance is Strong With This One
Not really...it's just something I hear gun people say a lot that I think elides the fact that guns are not required to do violence, and ignores the no guns equals no violence slight of hand used by the left to fool the ignorant. Sometimes we need to be clear that we don't have guns, want guns, or need guns just because criminals misuse them. But yeah, probably preaching to the choir here.mojo84 wrote:I think someone missed a heavy dose of sarcasm.
- Mon Dec 14, 2015 9:22 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: The Cognitive Dissonance is Strong With This One
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5230
Re: The Cognitive Dissonance is Strong With This One
And why would you be willing to make that deal? I wouldn't. You think the Zetas, Crips, MS13 and the like are going to stop being criminals if they temporarily don't have guns? You prepared to take on 3 or 4 guys with baseball bats or knives with your fists?Ruark wrote:Weeeelllllll, I'll tellya what. You go into all the hoods in cities like LA, Detroit, Miami, Chicago, St. Louis, the Texas border towns, etc. and get EVERY ONE of the Crips, Bloods, MS13s, Los Zetas, H. Angels, Mongols, Outlaws, Bandidos, psychiatric patients, felons, etc. to turn in all their guns, then I'll turn in mine. Deal?baldeagle wrote:Ban guns. All guns.
- Sun Dec 13, 2015 8:57 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: The Cognitive Dissonance is Strong With This One
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5230
Re: The Cognitive Dissonance is Strong With This One
baldeagle wrote:It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them.
Setting aside the fact that this bozo is an American living in Canada, she writes this:So, gee, it wouldn't be right to violate the civil rights of mentally ill people, but those darn gun people? Weeeeellllll, let's just round them all up and take away their guns, because gee, that wouldn't be, what was it she said? "Massively violating civil liberties and stigmatizing" to gun owners.Ban guns. All guns. Get rid of guns in homes, and on the streets, and, as much as possible, on police. Not just because of San Bernardino, or whichever mass shooting may pop up next, but also not not because of those. Don’t sort the population into those who might do something evil or foolish or self-destructive with a gun and those who surely will not. As if this could be known—as if it could be assessed without massively violating civil liberties and stigmatizing the mentally ill. Ban guns! Not just gun violence. Not just certain guns. Not just already-technically-illegal guns. All of them.
Geez.
Don't be so quick to reject her advice. She said take them from the police too. Let's start there...I'm all for it. Sure, there would be some collateral damage to our side, but the damage it would do to liberals, especially after police start quitting in droves, might well end any effective anti-gun nonsense for decades to come. They could say good bye to safe liberal enclaves isolated from the great unwashed American people they loath so much.