I don't, but as ELB says, it's an example of how "registration" works and how this administration makes up the law as it goes along, and if they get away with it, potential repercussions for those who own guns.couzin wrote:Just a question - how many people on this board have a fully functional m40 launcher and rounds?
Search found 2 matches
Return to “ATF Shadow-Bans 40mm Practice Ammunition”
- Mon Aug 10, 2015 11:24 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ATF Shadow-Bans 40mm Practice Ammunition
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1048
Re: ATF Shadow-Bans 40mm Practice Ammunition
- Thu Jul 30, 2015 5:16 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ATF Shadow-Bans 40mm Practice Ammunition
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1048
ATF Shadow-Bans 40mm Practice Ammunition
http://weaponsman.com/?p=24327
More lawless Obama administration contempt for citizens and law breaking by the BATF.
More lawless Obama administration contempt for citizens and law breaking by the BATF.
Well, that’s going to make conducting our planned M203 class hard impossible. The ATF, pushing the limits of what can be done with a stroke of the pen, is declaring previously approved illumination and training-practice rounds (the orange chalk marking rounds) to be “explosives”. They’re following this up with trips out to individuals to confiscate the ammunition for their approved, stamped Destructive Device 40mm launchers, unless the owner happens to have an explosives license and an ATF-approved bunker
Many of the actual agents against it. Some profanity.....I couldn't post here.Our friends inside ATF say that the initiative was conceived and planned in the Chief Counsel’s Office. That way, managers have explained to the rank and file, they won’t have to answer questions to the public, press or Congress “because everything is under lawyer-client privilege.” They seemed to split on whether Acting Director Thomas Brandon initiated this policy or merely signed off on it. “It wasn’t his idea,” one told us flatly. “He’s not that bright. It came from the lawyers, or from DOJ through the lawyers.”