TexasCHLforum.com

mojo84 wrote:What's the deal with everything coming down to race or sexual preference? Why not debate the water gun issue without going off into left field on an unrelated issue?

The influences for the ban come from the same sources: cultural Marxists, gender feminists, and social justice warriors. While I don't see race as relevant at all, sexual orientation is somewhat relevant because the attack is based on the organization being composed of males that espouse traditional values. That peripherally includes sexual orientation though the gender feminists actually hate all men, hetero or homo sexual.

ShootDontTalk wrote:Not to throw gasoline on the fire, but if water gun wars teach bad things, then when will they ban first person shooter video games? Those seem to teach that pulling the trigger creates blood, gore, and violent death in living color. A water gun fight just seems to teach....well I don't think it's apples to apples. Just PC stupidity run amuck.

David Grossman of all people has advocated just that.

That's not the only recent news that is cause for disappointment. They're also raising money for STEM programs that will include girls. I don't see the Girl Scouts including boys in their STEM program. Why don't organizations like this understand that capitulating to the cultural Marxists and gender feminists NEVER results in acceptance? The groups they're attempting to mollify hate their core values so the only thing that is ever going to satisfy the SJWs is ceasing to exist.