I see it as an expression of how relentless and determined they are to take away our rights and freedom and assert their control rather than a practical political act.K.Mooneyham wrote:They're trying to keep their elitist, big-government "street cred" up. Also, it allows them to pontificate on the subject and make outrageous claims and thus seem like they are "doing something". They know its going nowhere.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Proposed US Federal ban of greater than 10 round mags”
- Fri Feb 20, 2015 11:45 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Proposed US Federal ban of greater than 10 round mags
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1836
Re: Proposed US Federal ban of greater than 10 round mags
- Thu Feb 19, 2015 5:12 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Proposed US Federal ban of greater than 10 round mags
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1836
Proposed US Federal ban of greater than 10 round mags
http://www.examiner.com/article/u-s-sen ... government
Five years for you peasants with an 11 round mag or two 10 round mags taped or coupled together. Take that you miserable oxygen wasting and useless breeder and eater peons.
Five years for you peasants with an 11 round mag or two 10 round mags taped or coupled together. Take that you miserable oxygen wasting and useless breeder and eater peons.
United States Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) has never seen a proposed new infringement on that which shall not be infringed that he hasn't liked, so it should come as no surprise that he is enthusiastically on board with a pair of bills recently introduced in Congress that would impose a five-year prison term for acquiring an 11-round magazine. S.407/H.R. 752, the "Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act of 2015," introduced by Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and Representative Elizabeth Etsy (D-CT) respectively, would even ban the practice of attaching two of the "acceptable" capacity magazines together: