Search found 5 matches

by VMI77
Wed Mar 11, 2015 11:48 am
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes
Replies: 341
Views: 80626

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

cb1000rider wrote:
KD5NRH wrote: It's the Obama Administration; transparency doesn't apply to their actions.
And prior administrations were totally transparent? No domestic spying, secret prisons, in-determinant detainment. The grass wasn't really greener on that front.

It'd be more like the current administration to take steps to black out the whole thing under executive privilege.. At least that would fit.

I wonder if we'll find this thing in the next year or next 20 years... It still amazes me that something this big can just disappear.
Yeah, but the thing is, THIS administration campaigned against those prior abuses and promised to be the "most transparent administration in history."

If us peons can go to prison for lying to the Feds, seems like a guy running for president and lying to the whole country should go to prison too.
by VMI77
Fri Mar 14, 2014 1:42 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes
Replies: 341
Views: 80626

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

Looks to me like one or more involved parties is participating in a disinformation campaign.
by VMI77
Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:53 am
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes
Replies: 341
Views: 80626

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

Beiruty wrote:Here is what I think happened:
1) Transponder is turned off
2) Aircraft is descended in spiral mode to 300 ft above see level to avoid long distance radars.
3) Aircraft is flown to a remote island with enough runaway to land, fuel is available for another trip.
4) All electronics on board (including cellphones) are off.
4) Purpose of the hijack is criminal in nature.
Except according to what they are reporting now, the engines reported data for 4 hours after the transponder went off. And at 300 feet, given their fuel load, their range would be significantly limited. Also, the Malaysian military track of the unidentified aircraft had it at 29,500 feet.
by VMI77
Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:04 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes
Replies: 341
Views: 80626

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

Another more plausible explanation?

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=228843&page=2
A November 2013 FAA Airworthiness Directive for the 777

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013...2..." onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for

certain The Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by a report of cracking in the fuselage skin underneath the
satellite communication (SATCOM) antenna adapter. This proposed AD
would require repetitive inspections of the visible fuselage skin and
doubler if installed, for cracking, corrosion, and any indication of
contact of a certain fastener to a bonding jumper, and repair if
necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracking and
corrosion in the fuselage skin, which could lead to rapid decompression
and loss of structural integrity of the airplane.

Summary: Its plausible that a fuselage section near the SATCOM antenna adapter failed, disabling satellite based - GPS, ACARS, and ADS-B/C - communications, and leading to a slow decompression that left all occupants unconscious. If such decompression left the aircraft intact, then the autopilot would have flown the planned route or otherwise maintained its heading/altitude until fuel exhaustion.
A slow decompression (e.g. from a golfball-sized hole) would have gradually impaired and confused the pilots before cabin altitude (pressure) warnings sounded.
Chain of events:

Likely fuselage failure near SATCOM antenna adapter, disabling some or all of GPS, ACARS, ADS-B, and ADS-C antennas and systems.
Thus, only primary radars would detect the plane. Primary radar range is usually less than 100nm, and is generally ineffective at high altitudes.

If the decompression was slow enough, its possible the pilots did not realize to put on oxygen masks until it was too late. (See Helios 522)

Also explains why another Pilot thirty minutes ahead heard mumbling from MH370 pilots.
(VHF comms would be unaffected by SATCOM equipment failure.)

With incapacitated pilots, the 777 could continue to fly on Autopilot - programmed to maintain cruise altitude and follow the programmed route. Using the Inertial Reference System (gyroscope based), the plane could navigate without needing GPS.
Other thoughts:

The plane was equipped with cellular communication hardware, supplied by AeroMobile, to provide GSM services via satellite. However this is an aftermarket product; its not connected through SATCOM (as far as I know).
This explains why 19 families signed a statement alleging they were able to call the MH370 passengers and get their phones to ring, but with no response.
When Malaysian Airlines tried to call the phone numbers a day later, the phones did not ring. By this time, fuel would have been exhausted.

Note: 777 Passenger Oxygen masks do not deploy until cabin altitude reaches 13,500. Passengers were likely already unconscious by then, if it was a slow decompression. Also remember that this flight was a red-eye, most passengers would be trying to sleep, masking alarming effects of oxygen deprivation. No confirmed debris has been found anywhere near the search area, consistent with the plane having flown for hours after it lost radar contact.
Conclusion:
This was likely not an explosive decompression or inflight disintegration. This was likely a slow decompression that gradually deprived all crew/passengers of oxygen, leaving the autopilot to continue along the route autonomously.
by VMI77
Wed Mar 12, 2014 9:54 am
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes
Replies: 341
Views: 80626

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

Keith B wrote: The ADS-B information is sent on 1090Mhz and stations can receive a plane at that altitude between 200 - 250 miles out if the antenna is in a good location. ADS-B data is transmitted 2 times a second. The ADS-B reception was lost to station T-WMKC1 (Sultan Ismail Petra Airport ADS-B receiver) at about 17:20UTC on 3/7. It doesn't mean it went down right then, but that it went out off the grid as far as the ADS-B reception went. Without knowing how far out that station can receive the signal normally we can't tell if that is a valid last transmission point or if it just went out of range. I don't believe Vietnam or Cambodia allow real-time tracking of flights to be transmitted out to the Internet, so there would be no private station data from there if the plane came into range. I am one of the private stations here in the US that is a feeder to one of the the tracking services. I am currently using my personal equipment but am being sent equipment from the company to host for them.

Here is the real-time track of the flight http://fr24.com/2014-03-07/17:05/12x/MAS370/2d81a27" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and a good article on what the service I am part of saw http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2014/03/10/ ... nly-holes/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Are you using RTL-SDR for ADS-B tracking? If so, what antenna do you use? I just ordered a TV28T v2 USB DVB-T & RTL-SDR Receiver, RTL2832U & R820T Tuner.

Return to “Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes”