TexasCHLforum.com

jmra wrote:

Dave2 wrote:

VMI77 wrote:Ummmm.....where is the compensation for the taking of property as required by the Constitution?

Now that is an excellent question.

If they were concerned about the constitution they wouldn't take them to begin with.

True, but there are some parts of the document that are still mostly enforced. One of the things preventing non-grandfathered bans is the requirement to pay compensation for property taken by the government. It seems like this issue should be litigated as precedent is not on the side of the gun grabbers.

Ummmm.....where is the compensation for the taking of property as required by the Constitution?