JALLEN wrote: A less efficient means of educating our children could scarcely be imagined. We waste more and more on education and have less and less to show for it. All of it is squandered on the altar of teacher union demagoguery, and the pretensions of the educational lobby. These folks constantly whine for choice in other areas of life. Why not have it in educating our children?
Having attended public school myself, both in California and Texas, and having homeschooled my children, I can attest to the inefficiency of public schools. And absolutely these ridiculous unions are a problem. One of my sons is an honor's graduate with a B S in biology. He was employed for awhile as an English tutor for students at the local college. Now he is tutoring public school children in mathematics. He is prohibited from tutoring any other subject because he is not a "certified teacher." So, he can tutor college seniors in English but not 1st graders or high school sophomores. He can teach the SAT --all of it-- but can't "tutor" a high school student in any subject but mathematics. OTOH, my wife quit high school and got a GED. SHE taught our youngest to read, and schooled him herself until his mathematical needs exceeded her ability, when he was around 12 or so. He graduated UT Austin as a double major (B S and BA degrees), got a perfect score on the LSAT, and was admitted to Harvard Law School (though he chose to go to the University of Chicago on full scholarship). Since both of my children have exceeded this public school graduate in academic achievement, without the assistance of a public school or a union "certified" teacher, my experience leads me to see about zero value added in return for the agony and expense of our public school system. In fact, given the public school indoctrination in collectivism I'd say the public schools are worse than nothing.