TexasCHLforum.com

And to add to TAMs list, the State of Missouri has turned over their CHL holder list to the Feds, twice.

http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/hig ... 0f31a.html

Kinda makes you wonder what other states have done....since apparently the Feds asked for the list. I think the Feds are illegally creating a de-facto registration by whatever means they can get the data, including the easy way, via requests as above, and by snooping and stealing data. The next move is probably for Holder to require gun dealers to submit copies of their 4473's on some pretext, like a "study" of gun ownership, claiming it won't be used for registration.

Hard to believe this:

GTRich94 wrote:The bill will not take away anyone's guns.

In light of this, with what is already happening in NY, and lack of any detail about what constitutes a mental health record and grounds for denial.

GTRich94 wrote:Clarifies that submissions of mental health records into the NICS system are not prohibited by federal privacy laws (HIPAA)

The mental health record aspect looks like a hole big enough to drive an MRAP through. No mention of any appeal process, what kind of records will be submitted, how they will be vetted, basis for denial, or if denial will lead to subsequent confiscation.

It will increase the cost by a lot more than $20. It will on the average also increase the time it takes to find a buyer or seller. If I want to find someone with a 1911 for sale and don't want my purchase registered the leg work required to find a seller will have both an opportunity cost and a real cost. But these aspects still are not as important as how the Bill defines a transfer. If it has the original language defining a transfer it is a horrendous assault on law abiding citizens.