Search found 8 matches

by VMI77
Sat Apr 13, 2013 11:25 am
Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
Topic: LEO's under attack
Replies: 57
Views: 9841

Re: LEO's under attack

gigag04 wrote:I would suggest anyone jealous of PD pension benefits go through the academy and go get their own.

Free market economy works both ways...you saying that my retirement should be more like yours is no different than me wanting my salary to look like and escalate on the same level as a private sector professional.

And FWIW, I'm not going to be a cop forever. I have been completing my engineering degree by day and working at night. I graduate in a few weeks and have accepted an electrical manufacturer. I'll still hit the streets as a reserve once a month or so, and will probably get into training too...
Policing is one of the few legitimate government "services." I don't have any problem with how much law enforcement gets paid. I think most of us responding here are talking about the pay for those government jobs that shouldn't be performed by government at all.

Congratulations to you, but I have mixed feelings personally....you sound like one of the good cops we need more of, so while on the one hand good for you, on the other it's a shame that a good cop is lost to other employment.
by VMI77
Tue Apr 09, 2013 2:05 pm
Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
Topic: LEO's under attack
Replies: 57
Views: 9841

Re: LEO's under attack

talltex wrote:How about our own State Legislators? Why would anyone spend the money to run for an office that pays only $600 per month plus $150 per diem while in session ( comes out to $17,000 per year)...because if they hold an office only 8 years, they are entitled to full pension benefits starting at age 60, based not on their own small salaries, but on a Judge's salary of $125,000 per year. If they hold office for just 10 years total, they can start drawing the pension money at age 50! PLUS, they receive lifetime health insurance benefits. :grumble

That's not the only scam. Used to have a coworker who got appointed to some State board/committee, and they get a similar deal, except their pension is based on the pay of whoever heads the branch or department of government the committee/board reports through --and in many cases that is way more than $125K per year.
by VMI77
Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:40 am
Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
Topic: LEO's under attack
Replies: 57
Views: 9841

Re: LEO's under attack

Panda wrote:
VMI77 wrote: I agree completely...notice I put "free market" in quotes. My point was simply that the pay isn't a mystery and is known beforehand and qualified people still choose the job. If there were not enough qualified people to do the job then either the pay would have to be increased or the qualifications lowered. It appears that at the current levels of qualification there are sufficient people choosing to do the job, and that suggests that the level of pay must be either too high or about right, and not too low.
Not just base pay but total compensation. Government pensions are a huge drain on the tax base. Fifty years ago when the taxpayers had pensions from their corporate employers, maybe that was reasonable. However, in the current job market where private sector pensions are rare, its time to eliminate them for public servants too. From dog catcher to senator, they should get no retirement perks except SS and what they save. The same as the people paying their paycheck.
Do you realize that, for example, City of Austin employees can retire at 66% of base pay after 20 years employment? I work with a guy whose friend retired at age 37, after 17 years service, having bought out his last three years. This isn't merely outrageous, it's mathematically unsustainable.
by VMI77
Mon Apr 08, 2013 10:23 am
Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
Topic: LEO's under attack
Replies: 57
Views: 9841

Re: LEO's under attack

gringo pistolero wrote:
VMI77 wrote:And as far as being paid enough.....we're supposed to have a "free market," and imperfections granted, if the pay wasn't enough to attract enough qualified people to do the job then pay would have to increase.
We're supposed to have a free market but then the unions get involved and the market is no longer free. We often end up with people who are paid more than the fair market value of their work, but believe they are underpaid because they drank the koolaid. Look at teachers for a good example.

Many people think private schools do a better job educating children than public schools. They vote with their wallet when they pay the tuition. But if you look at salaries, private school teachers often get paid less than public school teachers. And why do public school teachers get paid more? It's the unions.
I agree completely...notice I put "free market" in quotes. My point was simply that the pay isn't a mystery and is known beforehand and qualified people still choose the job. If there were not enough qualified people to do the job then either the pay would have to be increased or the qualifications lowered. It appears that at the current levels of qualification there are sufficient people choosing to do the job, and that suggests that the level of pay must be either too high or about right, and not too low.
by VMI77
Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:05 pm
Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
Topic: LEO's under attack
Replies: 57
Views: 9841

Re: LEO's under attack

gigag04 wrote:When was the last 7-11 clerk raped?

Eh nm..I don't really care to get into it on the interwebs...
I typed in "convenience store clerk raped" on Google and got 391,000 hits. These stories go back over the years....don't know what the rate per year is. The first link is from February 22, 2013, in Texas. I don't think it was the "last one" though. Of course I'm not suggesting it has happened anywhere near 300,000 times, but it seems to happen with some regularity. I'll just put it this way.....I'd much rather have a daughter that is a LEO than one working a night shift at a convenience store. Typing "convenience store clerk shot to death" produces 610,000 hits. So, I'd also much rather have a son that is a LEO (and in fact, almost did, with my encouragement) than a son working in a convenience store, since most of the clerks are left defenseless, and a LEO can at least defend himself. In fact, I too would have gone into LE when I left the military (though probably with the Feds instead of state or local LE), but at the time I had other opportunities that paid much more, and somewhat regrettably, I chose the money.

http://www.cbs19.tv/story/21312501/more ... store-rape

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories ... store.html

http://www.wowt.com/home/headlines/Linc ... tion=story

http://www.scsolicitor9.org/30years.htm

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/201 ... obbery-suv

http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1 ... 96,6153570

http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2003-0 ... rts-clerks

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/198 ... ence-store

http://articles.philly.com/1988-03-31/n ... ring-clerk

http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/ne ... 11a66.html

http://lubbockonline.com/news/012397/ma2n.htm

http://www.houmatoday.com/article/20070 ... S/705090318

http://www.greenevillesun.com/Local_New ... -id-271967
by VMI77
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:27 am
Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
Topic: LEO's under attack
Replies: 57
Views: 9841

Re: LEO's under attack

texanjoker wrote:
VMI77 wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
gigag04 wrote:My experience with the phrase "with all due respect" usually means that person feels little is due...

I know handog had a situation that would frustrate most of us here so I can view his comments in that filter.
....which is exactly the kind of judgement most cops are called on to make every single day, and which most of the rest of us aren't. I don't want to beat handog up either, because I have posted in his favor many times about that particular incident......which remains an object lesson to ALL CHL holders of what can happen, even unintentionally, if we are not deliberate about concealment.

There are jobs which, in some purely statistical sense, year in and year out, might carry some higher degree of danger.......meaning more people get killed every year doing that job than any other. But, those dangers are related to machinery, hot metal, slippery surfaces, etc., whereas there are NO other jobs (outside of being an infantryman in a war zone) where the greatest danger, every single day, and every single encounter, is from your fellow human beings. That job description alone is the province of LEOs and nobody else's. Humans are at the top of the food chain, and they are not there because they run faster, have bigger teeth or claws, or more powerful muscles than any other animal. Humans are at the top of the food chain because they are more intelligent and more cunning than any other animals, AND humans are the only animals capable of one other thing: deliberately evil intent.

THAT is what makes LEO work so dangerous. How many fishermen, loggers, or airline pilots have to pull over a carload of people who are manifestly up to no good, and process whatever it is they are up to? At 2:00 a.m.? When your nearest backup is 10 minutes away? Several times a night? EVERY shift? Fishermen get killed by weather and the cold ocean. Loggers get cut down by falling timber and out of control equipment. Airline pilots get taken by defective aircraft and weather. But the dangers they face are either impersonal......they're just in the way at the wrong time....or sometimes their own errors, such as pilot error. Cops are different. Their lethal threats are TRYING to hurt them or kill them.........and that makes all the difference in the world. That's why (A) we hold them so much more accountable for screwing up when they do; and (B) why we owe them an extra measure of respect when they don't.....because they face that danger so that we don't have to.......and that's the difference.

I don't think they get paid enough for the responsibility they are asked to shoulder. But, as I have also posted before, I insist on accountability, because the very fabric of our society depends on every LEO rising above the baser instincts many of us would succumb to when pressed out of our comfort zones. Any cop who pulls that off has my unfiltered respect. Every cop who fails to meet the standard has my unfiltered condemnation, because our culture and social stability depend on respect for authority (not the same thing as "subjugation" to authority). Cops who abuse that respect threaten our social order. Those who uphold it are part of the ties that bind us together, and we're all better for it.

It's really that basic.
I'm just as dead if I'm killed by falling timber or a bullet. And statistically, about 40-50% of LEO deaths are from traffic accidents. Yes, traffic stops are potentially extremely dangerous. Potentially. The fact is, deadly encounters are statistically rare --though I imagine unpleasant encounters with idiots and jerks are frequent. Also on the top ten list are convenience store clerks. They make less money that LEO's, generally have no means of defending themselves, have no backup, are often alone at 2AM or 3AM, and are also killed by people, not hot coffee and paper cuts. LEO's absolutely have the more difficult job, but just how are they "more accountable?" If I mistake someone with a water nozzle as having a gun and shoot him I'm going to prison. If I shoot at someone who pulls a gun on me and I miss and hit an innocent bystander, I'm going to prison. This is virtually never the outcome for LE. And as far as being paid enough.....we're supposed to have a "free market," and imperfections granted, if the pay wasn't enough to attract enough qualified people to do the job then pay would have to increase. The market sets the pay just like it does for my job and anyone who doesn't find the pay sufficient and can make more money doing something else is free to do so.
Are you serious? Deadly encounters happen all the time in police work. You just don't read about them unless the officer fires their gun or there is some controversy that makes the news. Fatal statistics are also not a true indicator of the dangers. Many more leo's are shot, stabbed or critically injured, but thankfully survive so they don't make the fatal stat. But hey if you wan't to compare leo's to 7-11 clerks have at it.
Are you serious? You can't have it both ways. An encounter is either deadly or it is not. The comparison being made is for fatalities. But if you want to get into injury statistics you may have a point, or may not. I don't know what the comparable injury statistics are but will be happy to learn. I can make some intuitive guesses though....for instance, we know something like 80% of handgun wounds are not fatal. I think we can safely assume that a 7-11 clerk is less likely to be wearing body armor than a police officer. We know a store clerk is unlikely to have any training in self-defense. We can therefore guess that if more clerks are stabbed and shot than LEOs, then more will also be wounded or critically injured. In fact, I would guess that many more people are critically injured than killed in every one of the top ten professions on that posted list. How do the rates stack up to LEO's? I don't know. However, I've worked in a profession on that list, and in my experience many more people were seriously and critically injured than killed, probably by a factor of 10. But I haven't seen the stats.....so that's just anecdotal data.

One big difference between the two is that LEO's knowingly and deliberately place themselves into dangerous situations, so, as I already said, LEO's have the more difficult job. You seem not to have much sympathy for 7-11 clerks, some of whom are women and end up raped and murdered. A clerk is frequently confronted by the same kinds of jerks and thugs police officers confront, but without the stature and authority of the badge, without a weapon, without training, and without backup. My comparison is based on statistics compiled by the government. You are absolutely correct that those statistics, any statistics for that matter, don't convey a complete picture of the dangers.....but it is about the only objective data we have available for comparisons. If you have injury statistic comparisons I welcome hearing them.
by VMI77
Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:01 am
Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
Topic: LEO's under attack
Replies: 57
Views: 9841

Re: LEO's under attack

The Annoyed Man wrote:
gigag04 wrote:My experience with the phrase "with all due respect" usually means that person feels little is due...

I know handog had a situation that would frustrate most of us here so I can view his comments in that filter.
....which is exactly the kind of judgement most cops are called on to make every single day, and which most of the rest of us aren't. I don't want to beat handog up either, because I have posted in his favor many times about that particular incident......which remains an object lesson to ALL CHL holders of what can happen, even unintentionally, if we are not deliberate about concealment.

There are jobs which, in some purely statistical sense, year in and year out, might carry some higher degree of danger.......meaning more people get killed every year doing that job than any other. But, those dangers are related to machinery, hot metal, slippery surfaces, etc., whereas there are NO other jobs (outside of being an infantryman in a war zone) where the greatest danger, every single day, and every single encounter, is from your fellow human beings. That job description alone is the province of LEOs and nobody else's. Humans are at the top of the food chain, and they are not there because they run faster, have bigger teeth or claws, or more powerful muscles than any other animal. Humans are at the top of the food chain because they are more intelligent and more cunning than any other animals, AND humans are the only animals capable of one other thing: deliberately evil intent.

THAT is what makes LEO work so dangerous. How many fishermen, loggers, or airline pilots have to pull over a carload of people who are manifestly up to no good, and process whatever it is they are up to? At 2:00 a.m.? When your nearest backup is 10 minutes away? Several times a night? EVERY shift? Fishermen get killed by weather and the cold ocean. Loggers get cut down by falling timber and out of control equipment. Airline pilots get taken by defective aircraft and weather. But the dangers they face are either impersonal......they're just in the way at the wrong time....or sometimes their own errors, such as pilot error. Cops are different. Their lethal threats are TRYING to hurt them or kill them.........and that makes all the difference in the world. That's why (A) we hold them so much more accountable for screwing up when they do; and (B) why we owe them an extra measure of respect when they don't.....because they face that danger so that we don't have to.......and that's the difference.

I don't think they get paid enough for the responsibility they are asked to shoulder. But, as I have also posted before, I insist on accountability, because the very fabric of our society depends on every LEO rising above the baser instincts many of us would succumb to when pressed out of our comfort zones. Any cop who pulls that off has my unfiltered respect. Every cop who fails to meet the standard has my unfiltered condemnation, because our culture and social stability depend on respect for authority (not the same thing as "subjugation" to authority). Cops who abuse that respect threaten our social order. Those who uphold it are part of the ties that bind us together, and we're all better for it.

It's really that basic.
I'm just as dead if I'm killed by falling timber or a bullet. And statistically, about 40-50% of LEO deaths are from traffic accidents. Yes, traffic stops are potentially extremely dangerous. Potentially. The fact is, deadly encounters are statistically rare --though I imagine unpleasant encounters with idiots and jerks are frequent. Also on the top ten list, at times, are convenience store clerks. They make less money that LEO's, generally have no means of defending themselves, have no backup, are often alone at 2AM or 3AM, and are also killed by people, not hot coffee and paper cuts. LEO's absolutely have the more difficult job, but just how are they "more accountable?" If I mistake someone with a water nozzle as having a gun and shoot him I'm going to prison. If I shoot at someone who pulls a gun on me and I miss and hit an innocent bystander, I'm going to prison. This is virtually never the outcome for LE. And as far as being paid enough.....we're supposed to have a "free market," and imperfections granted, if the pay wasn't enough to attract enough qualified people to do the job then pay would have to increase. The market sets the pay just like it does for my job and anyone who doesn't find the pay sufficient and can make more money doing something else is free to do so.
by VMI77
Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:44 am
Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
Topic: LEO's under attack
Replies: 57
Views: 9841

Re: LEO's under attack

bci21984 wrote:
handog wrote:With all due respect and sympathies due to the recent events. "LEO'S under attack" seems a bit dramatic. I'd say LEOs are heroes for providing for their families like the rest of us. As far as putting their lives in "harms way", they are not in the top ten. How about these unsung heroes as well.


The 10 Deadliest Jobs:

1. Fishers and related fishing workers

2. Logging workers

3. Aircraft pilot and flight engineers

4. Refuse and recyclable material collectors

5. Roofers

6. Structural iron and steel workers

7. Farmers, ranchers, and other agricultural managers

8. Drivers/sales workers and truck drivers

9. Electrical power-line installers and repairers

10. Taxi drivers and chauffeurs

:clapping:
You ever shot at your trash man for picking up your trash, ever cussed out the airline pilot for flying the plane, or bad mouthed the farmer for growing your produce? Law enforcement is despised by many simply for the uniform they wear and for what it stands for. Many of those despisers have/will/want to harm law enforcement for it also. If you feel so negatively, feel free to suit up and join 'em in an attempt to better the field.
What? Just how does posting the FACT that LE is usually not in the top ten list of most dangerous jobs constitute feeling negatively about LE?

Furthermore, the trash man has never pulled me over and said I was speeding when I was not, an airline pilot can't arrest me and take me off to jail if I cuss him out for flying a plane, and I haven't seen many articles about farmers knocking on doors or entering yards and shooting the dogs of people who have committed no crime. Furthermore, my contacts with trash men, airline pilots, and farmers is completely voluntary on my part. I don't have to buy an airline ticket, I can take my own trash to the dump, and if I don't like the looks of produce in the store I don't have to buy it. I have to pay the taxes that pay the salaries of police officers, and a police officer has the power to arrest me, ticket me, or even kill me, and if he abuses that power I have little recourse in the first two instances, all after the fact, and none in the last. So comparing a LEO to a trash man or an airline pilot is just absurd.

That said, the vast majority of my contacts with LE, especially here in Texas, have been good, and the officers have been professional (though years ago I did encounter one DPS officer who lied and otherwise conducted himself unprofessionally and I reported the incident to his superiors). Less true in the Northeast. In the last few years, all of my contacts with LE have been good, and in most cases, the officers have been very generous regarding traffic infractions of which I was admittedly guilty.

Return to “LEO's under attack”